How to choose the andesite crusher?

Choosing the right andesite crusher requires careful consideration of several factors related to the material properties, your operational needs, and desired final product. Here's a step-by-step guide:

Key Factors to Consider:

1. Andesite Properties:

   • Hardness & Abrasiveness: Andesite is a medium-hard to hard rock (typically 6-7 on Mohs scale) and is highly abrasive due to its mineral composition (feldspar, pyroxene, often quartz). This is the most critical factor.

   • Silica Content: Generally high, contributing significantly to abrasiveness.

   • Moisture Content: Is the material dry, damp, or wet? Wet/sticky material can cause clogging in some crushers.

   • Feed Size: What is the maximum lump size of the rock coming from the quarry face or primary blast?

2. Production Requirements:

   • Capacity (TPH): How many tons per hour do you need to process? This dictates the size and type of crusher.

   • Final Product Size & Shape:

     • Size: What is the required top size (e.g., 1", 3/4", 1/2")? Do you need multiple products?

     • Shape (Cubicity): Is a cubical shape critical (e.g., for high-quality concrete aggregate, asphalt)? Or is a more flaky/angular shape acceptable (e.g., for base course, riprap)? Different crushers produce different particle shapes.

   • Grading Requirements: Are there specific size distribution specifications (e.g., % passing various sieves)?

3. Crushing Stage:

   • Primary Crushing: Reducing large blasted rock (e.g., 24"-48") down to a manageable size (e.g., 6"-8").

   • Secondary Crushing: Further reducing primary crushed material (e.g., 6"-8") to a smaller size (e.g., 1"-3").

   • Tertiary/Quaternary Crushing: Producing final aggregate sizes (e.g., 3/4", 1/2", 3/8") and shaping the product. Sometimes includes sand production.

4. Application:

   • What is the end use? (Concrete aggregate, asphalt aggregate, railway ballast, base course, riprap, manufactured sand?) This heavily influences product shape and size requirements.

5. Site Conditions & Infrastructure:

   • Mobility: Do you need a stationary plant, a modular plant, or a mobile crusher (tracked/wheeled)?

   • Feed Method: How will material be fed? (Excavator, wheel loader, dump truck, apron feeder?)

   • Power Supply: What electrical power is available? Diesel power needed?

   • Space Constraints: How much physical space is available?

   • Downstream Processes: What equipment follows the crusher? (Screens, conveyors, washing plant?) The crusher must integrate seamlessly.

Common Crusher Types for Andesite & Their Suitability:

1. Jaw Crushers (Best for Primary Crushing):

   • Pros: Very robust, handle large feed sizes well, relatively low initial cost, good for very abrasive rock. Produce a range of sizes, generally acceptable shape for primary.

   • Cons: Less precise control over final product size/shape compared to cone crushers, product can be flakier. Higher wear cost per ton than cones if processing highly abrasive rock constantly, but often the most economical primary choice.

   • Andesite Fit: Excellent choice for primary crushing due to ability to handle large, abrasive feed. Look for robust designs with easily replaceable wear parts (cheek plates, jaw dies). Opt for models with good nip angles and deep crushing chambers.

2. Cone Crushers (Best for Secondary, Tertiary, Quaternary):

   • Pros: Produce well-shaped, cubical product. Precise control over product size (especially with modern hydrocones). Generally lower operating cost per ton for hard, abrasive rock compared to impactors due to compression crushing and slower speed. Handle abrasive rock well with proper liner selection.

   • Cons: Higher initial cost than impactors. More sensitive to feed size distribution and segregation. Can be sensitive to moisture/sticky feed causing packing. More complex maintenance.

   • Andesite Fit: The dominant choice for secondary and tertiary crushing of hard, abrasive rock like andesite. Choose robust models designed for abrasive applications (e.g., tertiary configurations). Hydraulic adjustment and clearing are highly recommended. Prioritize models with excellent wear part availability and life.

3. Impact Crushers (Horizontal Shaft Impactor - HSI / Vertical Shaft Impactor - VSI):

   • Pros: Produce the best cubical shape. Good for producing manufactured sand. Often lower initial cost than cones. Can handle softer rock very efficiently.

   • Cons: High wear cost per ton on hard, abrasive rock like andesite. Blow bars/hammers and anvils wear rapidly. Higher operating costs for abrasive applications. More sensitive to feed size in primary/secondary roles. Product size control can be less precise than cones in some applications.

   • Andesite Fit:

     • HSI: Can be used for secondary/tertiary if cubical shape is paramount and you are prepared for high wear part costs and frequent changes. Less ideal than cones for pure cost/ton in abrasive applications. Avoid for primary unless specifically designed (rare for hard rock).

     • VSI: Excellent for final shaping and manufactured sand production from andesite feed (often after a cone crusher). Wear costs are very high but may be justified for premium sand products. Requires consistent feed size.

4. Gyratory Crushers:

   • Pros: Very high capacity primary crushers. Handle large feed sizes well. Lower headroom than large jaw crushers.

   • Cons: Very high capital cost. Complex installation and maintenance. Less common in smaller to medium-sized quarries.

   • Andesite Fit: Suitable for very high-capacity primary crushing applications where large feed size is common.

5. Roll Crushers:

   • Pros: Simple design, low fines production.

   • Cons: Low capacity, limited reduction ratio, not suitable for hard, abrasive rock in primary/secondary roles.

   • Andesite Fit: Generally not suitable for significant crushing of andesite, except possibly for very niche tertiary applications with small feed size and low capacity.

Selection Process Summary:

1. Define Requirements: Get clear on feed size, required capacity, final product size(s), shape needs, and budget (capital & operating).

2. Primary Crushing: Jaw Crushers are almost always the best choice for primary crushing of andesite due to robustness and cost-effectiveness at this stage. Gyratory only for very high capacities.

3. Secondary Crushing: Cone Crushers are overwhelmingly the preferred choice for hard, abrasive andesite. They offer the best balance of product quality, control, and operating cost per ton. Robust HSIs are an option only if shape is absolutely critical and wear costs are acceptable.

4. Tertiary/Quaternary Crushing & Shaping:

   • For aggregate sizing: Cone Crushers (in closed circuit with screens) remain the most cost-effective and reliable choice.

   • For premium shaped aggregates/sand: Add a VSI after a cone crusher. The cone does the heavy reduction, the VSI provides final shaping/sand making. Expect high VSI wear costs.

5. Mobile vs. Stationary: Choose based on project duration, mobility needs, and site logistics. The crusher type principles above still apply.

6. Wear Parts & Maintenance: For abrasive andesite, prioritize crushers known for:

   • Long wear part life (manganese quality, design).

   • Ease and speed of wear part replacement (minimize downtime).

   • Excellent service and parts availability from the manufacturer/dealer.

7. Get Expert Advice & Test: Consult reputable crusher manufacturers (e.g., Metso, Sandvik, Terex, Thyssenkrupp, Astec/KPI-JCI, Eagle Crusher, McLanahan). Provide them with your specific material analysis and requirements. If possible, conduct crushing trials with your actual andesite feed.

In essence: For most andesite crushing applications, a robust Jaw Crusher for primary followed by one or more robust Cone Crushers (often in closed circuit with screens) for secondary and tertiary crushing is the most reliable and cost-effective solution over the lifespan of the operation. Add a VSI only if premium sand or final shaping is absolutely required. Always prioritize wear resistance and maintenance accessibility.

More Information on my website. You can search on search engines: SBM Mill & Crusher